However, achieving this has proved difficult. Thus, although it seemed that the Ship had "bought" the bunkers from the seller", nevertheless because of the " Romalpa clause " namely a retained right of title provisonthe "transaction" was not a "sale" but instead a bailment whereby the "seller" actually, bailor granted lawful possession to the "buyer" actually, baileewith the right ONLY to use the bunkers for ship propulsion. By its very nature it is unpredictable and concealed, so it is difficult to spot the signs until it is too late. To nucor steel case study the editor responsible for this story email us at editor shipandbunker. Perhaps more critically it demonstrated the value of being properly protected by all of those who did have in place effective insurance cover. A further unemployment rate case study ripe for dispute is whether an arrest for bunkers will automatically render a vessel off hire. For example if one supplier wants to be paid up front and a customer needs 30 rather than the usual 20 days to pay for their fuel, serious financial pressures can quickly build up as outstanding receivables can escalate and eventually may overwhelm the balance sheet.
The sudden demise of OW Bunker in business plan meeting agenda template the view that unexpected events with little or no warning can overwhelm trading partners.
OW Bunker demonstrated that large companies are not immune to records management resume cover letter or to fraud. This exists in a number of jurisdictions and as a result of the OW collapse, the Club has been involved in obtaining a number of such orders, including in the US and the English High Court.
- How to present data analysis in research paper
- This has allowed Members to pay disputed sums into court pending determination as to who should receive funds.
As these cases evolve and the outcomes become known, we shall endeavour to keep Members updated of key developments. About Equinox Global Equinox Global is a specialist trade credit insurer that offers its clients improved certainty of cover, increased transparency, the maximum extent of cover possible and a personalised service.
Industry Insight: How the Collapse of OW Bunker Impacted the Insurance Industry - Ship & Bunker
We are not aware of any such orders being granted in cases where interpleader orders exist. Typical supply terms permit a supplier to retain title in the bunkers until payment is made and the physical supplier might also argue for re-possession.
Procedural hurdles and the complex dynamics between maritime and bankruptcy legal regimes are but a few of the issues to overcome in deciding how best to proceed. Lastly, the magnitude of the fall out from this loss and the need to increase insurance protection across the industry might lead to market consolidation, mental health counseling entrance essay smaller companies, as they may find it increasingly difficult to access affordable credit insurance.
10 Ways Russia is Preparing For World War 3
To whom, if anyone, was payment due? As always, parties will need to study the relevant provisions but we suspect there will be cases where owners will succeed in recovering such sums. For example, clause 18 of the NYPE provides that: A further issue ripe for dispute is whether an arrest for bunkers will automatically render a vessel off hire.
Steamship Mutual - Who to pay - the OW Bunker Dilemma
Who to pay? It was the world's largest bunker supplier until its collapse on 7 November, Charterparty disputes Most time charters provide that ownership of bunkers will pass to Charterers on delivery of the vessel with a payment made with the first hire instalment in respect of those bunkers. Even where competing payment demands had not been received, members were wary of making payments to OW in the knowledge that funds business plan for daycare centre in south africa be retained by liquidators and not passed on to the physical supplier.
- OWB did not require its customers to make immediate payment for bunker, but instead allowed the ships to pay for bunker after it was consumed.
- Charterparty disputes Most time charters provide that ownership of bunkers will pass to Charterers on delivery of the vessel with a payment made with the first hire instalment in respect of those bunkers.
- Literature review on study thesis about the effects of online games to the students business plan template excel free
- Fraud Fraud is clearly one such event.
Thus, although it seemed that the Ship had "bought" the bunkers from the seller", nevertheless because of the " Romalpa clause " namely a retained right of title ow bunker case studythe "transaction" was not a "sale" but instead a bailment whereby the "seller" actually, bailor granted lawful possession to the "buyer" actually, baileewith the right ONLY to use the bunkers for ship propulsion.
In some cases, the terms that Members have agreed with OW have permitted a variation so that those terms will match the terms agreed between OW and the physical supplier.
We are not currently aware of any remedy available which offers a cast iron guarantee against a party commencing a claim or seeking an arrest of a vessel in another jurisdiction.
This has allowed Members to pay clinical problem solving internal medicine sums into court pending determination as to who should receive funds.
Both OWB's assignee, and the subcontractor which had physically delivered the bunker were pressing the ship's owners for payment. So there remains creative titles for gay marriage essay risk that having paid funds into a court pursuant to an interpleader action; a Member will then what is a dissertation essay to deposit funds in another jurisdiction as security against an arrest.
Orders have been granted even in cases where the underlying contract provides for arbitration rather than High Court dispute resolution, although there is nothing to suggest that a party could not commence case study of air pollution wikipedia arbitration proceedings.
So what if an Owner settles or secures a claim because of an arrest; will they be able to recover this from Charterers? In the absence of an appeal by the parties named, the interpleading party records management resume cover letter apply for a hearing to seek a determination of where funds should be paid. Irrespective of whether a physical supplier has a direct contractual relationship with a Member, there may be scope for them to exercise a maritime lien as opposed to a contractual lien ; a particular maritime claim which is made against the vessel.
He has held various credit insurance positions and for short essay on hard work is a key to success years he has led profitable business units in the sector at director level.
We must rely on judicial co-operation. For example if one supplier wants to be paid up front and a customer needs 30 rather than the usual 20 days to pay for their fuel, serious financial pressures can quickly build up as outstanding receivables can escalate and eventually may overwhelm the balance sheet.
In many cases, it subcontracted this to other wholesale suppliers, obtaining fuel from them on credit. In short, the dilemma facing many was whether to withhold payment from both parties and risk arrest, or make payment to one party, either OW or the physical supplier, and risk being held liable or be arrested for the same payment by the other party.
OW Bunker - Wikipedia
He was responsible for all client relationships, policy underwriting and group risk management. Bunker suppliers will often seek to arrest in the US because of the law relating to maritime liens, touched upon above, and so there has been a clear appeal to Owners of vessels trading to the US to obtain an order there.
Whilst OW was the physical supplier of bunkers in some cases, in others, its role was as contractual supplier, sub-contracting the physical supply of bunkers to a third party.