Draft an organized response letter Here, you want to use suitable phrases to respond to the editor and reviewer, and to organize your responses in a clear and simple way. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. Writing effective response letters to reviewers: However, a few considerations remain to refine and wrap-up the final framework. Next, write a short paragraph that explains why your manuscript would be a good fit for the journal. If several comments suggest similar revisions, such as fixing particular grammar errors or changing key terms, you can provide a general response to all sample of bibliography in thesis comments.
Revising and responding
This is in addition to describing the changes in your point by point cover letter. When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments you must: Please share your thoughts in the comments section below. Further support Revising and responding Recommendation letter thesis you manuscript has come back from reviewers you may be given the opportunity to revise it in accordance with the reviewer comments.
Provide a polite and scientific rebuttal to any points or comments you disagree with.
At this point, be sure to check the deadline for returning your revised paper. If referees have raised similar concerns, redirect the response to the earlier mentioned comment.
Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript | Editage Insights A final word of advice:
Apr 14, In the latter case, we recommend organizing your responses clearly and simply in order to make the second review as efficient and smooth as possible i. Best of luck with your research!
As you formulate these responses, bear in mind that the reviewers will probably read this letter.
Stay up to date
The manuscript is original i. Stay up to date Our monthly newsletter offers valuable tips on writing and presenting your research most effectively, as well as advice on avoiding or resolving common problems that authors face. Do not insinuate reviewer bias or incompetence.
They should be able to offer you an extension but it is best to discuss this with them as early as possible. However, by following the steps and advice above and keeping in mind that the reviewers are our professional peers, the revision and response process can become more straightforward and better integrated with our research cycle.
Wrapping It Up The five key opinions stated above, point authors in the right direction of writing an effective rebuttal letter.
Your goal in revising the paper is not only to maintain an accurate description of what you did and your interpretation of the findings, but also to incorporate those comments from the reviewer that help to improve your description and interpretation.
Step 5: A final word of advice: It's not unusual for a contributor to Polar Research, the journal I edit, to be asked to revise her or his submission three or four times before it's finally accepted. Journal Cover Letter Templates Click here to download a Microsoft Word template for a standard journal cover letter also available with instructions in ChineseJapaneseKoreanPortugueseand Spanish.
Major comments: Share with your colleagues.
Case study market penetration letter will argue that your manuscript is a good fit for the journal you are submitting it to and highlight your most important findings. Avoid the urge to write a single reply to an entire review.
You can learn more about writing a cover letter and handling peer review comments in these posts: Major comments: A remark like "We look forward to hearing from you in due time regarding our submission and to respond to any further questions and comments you may have" is a better way to wind up your letter.
Conclusion In most guide in writing persuasive essay, nearly all papers require revision before being accepted for publication.
Be clear, avoiding ambiguous and blank statements. Our tailored function does make it impossible to fully interpret the data in terms of the prevailing theories. Remember if your manuscript is sent for a second round of peer review the reviewers will see this letter too.
Wrapping It Up
Have you drafted a rebuttal letter? Broadly, we recommend you start by thanking the reviewer, but thereafter thank the reviewer for only the specific comments that let you correct a mistake.
Responding to reviewer comments can be daunting, particularly if we have progressed in our research after submitting the paper. Step 2: You can skip stage 1 if the reviewer classified the comments as major and minor already.
Draft an organized response letter Here, you want to use suitable phrases to respond to the editor and reviewer, and to organize your responses in a clear and simple way.
A Writing Guide – Do’s and Don’ts
Strive to keep answers brief, succinct and well versed. If the decision letter doesn't cover letter for revised manuscript submission this clear, go ahead and ask the editor via e-mail. Be sure to plan the work you must do, including the drafting of the letter and any time for mother tongue essay prompts and translation of you revised paper and response letterwithin this time frame.
In addition, in its current form, we agree it would be difficult to tell that this measurement constitutes a significant improvement over previously reported values. A sentence along the cover letter for revised manuscript submission of "All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have been corrected" suffices.
If you cannot provide the required additional information in the revised manuscript, recommendation letter thesis state your reasons. Consider the reference style of the journal of interest and ensure you comply with the citation system for re-submission.
Writing effective response letters to reviewers: Tips and a template
Begin your cover letter with a paragraph that states the name of the manuscript and the names of the authors. Researchers can also seek support externallyto integrate a straightforward review and response process. Reviewer comment: You want to show them that you've given careful consideration to each comment even if you've chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point.
Step 4: Moreover, the results would be more instructive and easier to compare to previous results. Thanking the reviewers sets a positive tone to begin with, providing the basis for an ongoing amicable exchange. If several comments suggest similar revisions, such as fixing particular grammar errors or changing key terms, you can provide a general response to all such comments.
Original scientific articles require the full spectrum of research, and the inability to meet reviewer requests experimentally is not viable. This letter usually contains information on how to return your revised manuscript including instructions on how to highlight the changes made and when you need to return the revised version.